中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
沉浸“二次元消费”怎么破?****** 孙鸿松 谈到青春期沉浸在“二次元消费”中的孩子,国家二级心理咨询师、黄埔区心灵家园服务中心理事长孙鸿松体会很深。自2015年发起成立心灵家园“小船长俱乐部”以来,他的日常工作便是围着孩子们转。“来找我的青春期孩子家长很多,反映这种沉浸‘二次元世界’、消费漫画周边,不愿与家人交流的也非常多,更有不少孩子被定义为‘抑郁症’‘双向情感障碍’,家长为此愁得不行。这些情况可以说很普遍,也可以说‘心理综合治理’到了刻不容缓的地步。” 文、图/广州日报全媒体记者 冯秋瑜 “我们小时候信息来源相对单一,但现在的孩子能接触到的信息非常丰富,对他们的影响肯定是多元的,这些势必会对孩子正确价值观的形成产生影响。”孙鸿松认为,对于漫画、网络游戏等营建出来的所谓“二次元世界”,有一定的涉猎和喜爱并非坏事。 “这个问题值得家长认真想一想:为什么这些动漫能让孩子主动走近,而自己想亲近孩子却有距离?是否孩子在心里将家长放在了对立面?孩子的成长有两次‘自由’的时期,一次是学会走路,可以自由支配自己的身体,一次就是青春期,慢慢建立着自己的思想、人生观和对自我的探索、认知。如果与父母的关系长期处在对立状态,会造成抵触、排斥甚至破裂,这种情况下,环境中其他的思想文化就更容易占据甚至侵蚀他们的心灵,因此,父母首先要做的就是不要一味地批评而造成对立。” 孙鸿松说。 “现在的学习途径其实多种多样,如果孩子不适应眼下的教育方式,为什么不能允许她找到适合她自己的路呢?”从多年与孩子们平等对话、修复心灵的经历中孙鸿松认为,家长莫要一味要求孩子“考重点高中”“考重点大学”,“如果能达成这样的认知,就是我们对孩子过于沉浸‘二次元世界’问题进行心理综合治理中最为关键的一步。” “如果孩子能从漫画、网游或周边产品的享受中找到心灵的出口,其实不是坏事,重要的是父母能如何正确引导。为什么漫画和‘二次元’能走近孩子呢?因为那里面抽离了许多价值判断,不像现实世界带给孩子的压力。然而虚拟的世界毕竟有其问题,因此父母还是要尽可能多创建一些生活化、趣味性的社交活动,让孩子可以从中感受到现实空间的温度。” 像今年大年初一,孙鸿松就带儿子去了花都千年古村塱头,和小伙伴们组织了一个舞狮队伍。“在这种活动中,孩子可以感受到团队协作,也有真实的交流,气氛非常好。”他还告诉记者,自己曾要求子女带着他一起参加cosplay活动。“孩子们起初很诧异,我真诚地说‘带老爸去长长见识,我给你们当司机’,他们就带我去了。我去了当然也不懂什么,但我不拒绝、不批评,就观察他们在做什么,但亲子间的气氛无形中就改变了。爱和尊重是父母一定要坚持做到的重要元素,坚持下去就一定能找到和孩子共同成长的方向。” 谈及青少年的压岁钱消费,孙鸿松表示:“当下物质富裕了,更应培养孩子们的理财观念,引导其合理消费,树立对自己和家庭的责任、奉献意识,也可以引导孩子用压岁钱来帮助有需要的人。” (文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() |